|
Post by Diane Merkel on Apr 24, 2006 14:14:15 GMT -6
Congratulations!
In my opinion, your posts are always relevant.
Best wishes, Diane
|
|
|
Post by custerstillstands on Apr 25, 2006 12:18:41 GMT -6
I see the "shirtwearer" name . . . very flattering . . . I just wonder though how many of my posts were relevant You're writing a lots Doesn't mean (at all !) that it's relevant anyway
|
|
|
Post by Diane Merkel on Apr 25, 2006 18:07:11 GMT -6
SHUT UP!
|
|
|
Post by crzhrs on Apr 25, 2006 18:20:25 GMT -6
Now . . . now . . . don't let the little imps get the best of you.
I do like the giant letters though . . .
PS: Maybe scalps hanging from my belt would be more impressive than stars . . . the ToE would get a kick out of that!
|
|
|
Post by Diane Merkel on Apr 25, 2006 19:21:42 GMT -6
The big letters made me feel better. I'm over it.
Sorry, but the board only offers stars.
|
|
|
Post by crzhrs on Apr 26, 2006 8:35:55 GMT -6
Diane:
I was being a little silly . . . my way to aggitate the ToE
|
|
|
Post by weir on Apr 26, 2006 8:42:43 GMT -6
The big letters made me feel better. I'm over it. Sorry, but the board only offers stars. We are still waiting your contribution to the discussion.
|
|
|
Post by Diane Merkel on Apr 26, 2006 8:56:09 GMT -6
SHUT UP!
|
|
|
Post by crzhrs on Apr 26, 2006 9:25:54 GMT -6
I have given you countless posts which provides a wide variety of testimony which contradicts your sources. I see no reason to continue going over the same issues with the same responses. If you like, you, can go back and re-read my posts.
|
|
|
Post by weir on Apr 26, 2006 9:27:51 GMT -6
I have given you countless posts which provides a wide variety of testimony which contradicts your sources. I see no reason to continue going over the same issues with the same responses. If you like, you, can go back and re-read my posts. Get away so.
|
|
|
Post by weir on Apr 26, 2006 9:28:18 GMT -6
Short contribution. What about LBH ? You know, the June 25th battle ?
|
|
|
Post by crzhrs on Apr 26, 2006 9:35:37 GMT -6
I thought the contribution was intelligent, direct, and the right of the moderator to post as she pleases.
What about the LBH? You tell us again . . . I don't think we get your point.
|
|
|
Post by Diane Merkel on Apr 26, 2006 10:25:40 GMT -6
Short contribution. What about LBH ? You know, the June 25th battle ? OK, smartie. How about this? If Custer had given Reno support as he said he would, Custer's column would have gone back to Reno and supported his entire command at Reno-Benteen where they at least would have had a chance to defend themselves. Custer didn't support Reno; Custer died. End of story.
|
|
|
Post by Tricia on Apr 26, 2006 10:44:01 GMT -6
Short contribution. What about LBH ? You know, the June 25th battle ? OK, smartie. How about this? If Custer had given Reno support as he said he would, Custer's column would have gone back to Reno and supported his entire command at Reno-Benteen where they at least would have had a chance to defend themselves. Custer didn't support Reno; Custer died. End of story. Diane-- I can't agree with you more. Where the heck was that support? What really galls me (though I don't necessarily believe it) is if Curley was right and GAC actually saw Reno go down and still proceeded north ... I'm thinking I may have the best time ever at LBH this year! Regards, Leyton McLean
|
|
|
Post by Diane Merkel on Apr 26, 2006 10:48:44 GMT -6
We are going to have a great time on the bus trip, Leyton, so long as we don't discuss current politics!
|
|