|
Post by alfakilo on Jul 10, 2022 12:10:25 GMT -6
|
|
|
Post by shan on Jul 11, 2022 8:10:10 GMT -6
I'd like to recomend this article to those haven't yet read it, as a concise, well written summing up of what we know thus far, as your likely to read.
Never mind that its a little out of date, I believe that the identification of skull that was found as being that of Mitch Bouyer has since been discredited, but that apart, it is as I say, a valuable summing up.
Shan
|
|
|
Post by noggy on Jul 11, 2022 13:48:21 GMT -6
I'd like to recomend this article to those haven't yet read it, as a concise, well written summing up of what we know thus far, as your likely to read. Never mind that its a little out of date, I believe that the identification of skull that was found as being that of Mitch Bouyer has since been discredited, but that apart, it is as I say, a valuable summing up. Shan I reminds me of two things: just have good the Fox book is, and That I should re-read "They fell with Custer" one of these days. I was pretty sure it was accepted that the skull was Bouyer's, Shan. Will have to check up on the "latest news" on the old man! All the best, Noggy
|
|