|
|
Post by Diane Merkel on Feb 19, 2016 19:03:51 GMT -6
|
|
|
|
Post by dave on Feb 19, 2016 21:44:35 GMT -6
Is he from Queens?
Regards
Dave
|
|
|
|
Post by tubman13 on Feb 20, 2016 8:14:23 GMT -6
David,
I think not. This excerpt below alone eliminates that possibility. Unless you put it there(The Associates Board) it will never see the light of day there! The moderator has no use for anything that upsets his narrative.
1876 map at the Reno Court of Inquiry would have completely exonerated Major Reno concerning his conduct at the battle. ”
Regards,
Tom
|
|
|
|
Post by herosrest on May 7, 2016 15:36:12 GMT -6
DucemusThe Nightengale 'update' has been on't other board since before your Feb 20. There are the usual problems, though. In spades. The first Maguire map dates to July 2nd, 1876. It went to Brig. Gen. A.A. Humphreys with a preliminary report of the battle. Not a lot of people know that. That map was traced by Gillepie on 2nd August 1876, with some subtle subtles introduced. Here it be, www.friendslittlebighorn.com/images/reviews/gillespiemap.jpgHere is the Maguire map, of July 2nd, 1876 -  Now, far be it from me to spoil a good scalping, or Ho Down but things rapidly begin conforming to pear shaped, as soon as the later series of maps (official) come on line. Close study of the Nigtengale revelation shows that 'H' has become 'E', and that 'E' has become 'D'. We can discern from Gillespie's tracing of Maguire's initial map, that Yates and Reilly (or who ever the relevant legend denotes) were found in Deep Ravine as 7 & 8. All in all, it helps to yelp loudly when moons are full and especially if maps accompanied Maguire's reports of 1876 and 1877, to the Chief of Engineers, whether proximal or otherwise attached. The sketch map forwarded by Maguire in September 1876, showing locations of the dead on the field and rendered in colour was not proceeded. 
|
|
