Plains Indians with Napoleonic swords true or false?
Nov 19, 2015 16:18:13 GMT -6
fred and tubman13 like this
Post by wblastoff on Nov 19, 2015 16:18:13 GMT -6
hi,
I would not believe it if I did not own it!
I need the help of you guys, for I seem to have exhausted my path.
This sword is “supposed” to have been scavenged from an Indian battlefield, Montana in the late 19th century. Upon reading this both my friend and I (who is also knowledgeable about swords) belly laughed out loud and immediately dismissed this claim. This sword is Prussian Blucher 1811 and these are always veteran pick-ups from WW1. I sent pictures to some experts and everyone agreed it was most probably a Prussian 1811 based on length and tip. So my friend and I had a good laugh and I put this sword away. This sword continued to nag at me in the back of my mind. (If you are a collector you know an object has a story, and when it has not been told to your satisfaction, it pulls you back to it.) This sword pulled me back to it.
I proceeded to go over this sword (painstakingly) centimeter by centimeter with 25x magnification and then it appeared on the spine not legible to the naked eye “Josh H. Reddel & Co” This was not a Prussian sword but an English Model 1796 light Calvary sword. This sword had been cut and rounded at the tip. So I think, “ok cool”, but this still makes it an antique during the Indian Wars and puts it over 4,000 miles away from the plains of Montana. I truly believe, (I have not verified this) that 19 century U.S. Army regulations would not allow a U.S. Trooper to carry this “antique” sword in the 1870’s and more importantly why would a trooper want to? (I’m guessing he would be ridiculed!?)
So I get a headache and put this sword away again, until I stumble upon this on the internet, Native American Weapons: “There are many references in literature – descriptions, drawings and pictographs of swords by North American Indians Many of them were probably English, Model l796, light cavalry swords which were surpluses after the Napoleonic Wars These were sold throughout the American West, and one outlet in the l840s was the Bordeaux Trading Post near present- day Chadron. They became a type of status symbol, particularly amongst some of the plains tribes”. It starts to appear to me that the story of this sword being picked-up on a Montana battlefield is not as funny as I had originally thought.
What I have is an English Model 1796 light cavalry sword made by Josh H.Reddel & Co. with an inscription. This sword “may” have possibly been picked off of a Montana battlefield. It “may” have been owned by the Sioux. It may have historical significance and I may awake from this and commit Hari-kari with this sword.
Sword:
This sword has been exposed to the elements on the right side know more than a few years. (I base that on my experience with swords, some 25 odd years, with the emphasize on odd)
1796 English light Calvary sword
Manufacturer: Josh H. Reddel & Co
Length blade 30.5” (shortened, spear point removed)
Sword hallmarks: Josh H. Reddel & Co (spine)
Small English crown (right side fuller hardly visible through rust, visible only with 25x magnification only)
Inscription in gold almost completely faded:
“Found at Gen Custers Slaughter By The Indians”
(Gold paint appears period to 1870-1910)
Now as your laughing, for I did... can you let me know your opinion please?
I purchased the sword myself in New Jersey. I will never get any more info from the seller. The gentleman who sold the sword had no knowledge of swords or that the inscription was on it. This was a doorstop to the seller!
I know through my research that “The 7th Calvary boxed up and sent back their swords to Fort Abraham Lincoln” on the way to the Little Big Horn.
Please send me your imput as I have reached the end of my path
Best regards
Bill Rhumm
I would not believe it if I did not own it!
I need the help of you guys, for I seem to have exhausted my path.
This sword is “supposed” to have been scavenged from an Indian battlefield, Montana in the late 19th century. Upon reading this both my friend and I (who is also knowledgeable about swords) belly laughed out loud and immediately dismissed this claim. This sword is Prussian Blucher 1811 and these are always veteran pick-ups from WW1. I sent pictures to some experts and everyone agreed it was most probably a Prussian 1811 based on length and tip. So my friend and I had a good laugh and I put this sword away. This sword continued to nag at me in the back of my mind. (If you are a collector you know an object has a story, and when it has not been told to your satisfaction, it pulls you back to it.) This sword pulled me back to it.
I proceeded to go over this sword (painstakingly) centimeter by centimeter with 25x magnification and then it appeared on the spine not legible to the naked eye “Josh H. Reddel & Co” This was not a Prussian sword but an English Model 1796 light Calvary sword. This sword had been cut and rounded at the tip. So I think, “ok cool”, but this still makes it an antique during the Indian Wars and puts it over 4,000 miles away from the plains of Montana. I truly believe, (I have not verified this) that 19 century U.S. Army regulations would not allow a U.S. Trooper to carry this “antique” sword in the 1870’s and more importantly why would a trooper want to? (I’m guessing he would be ridiculed!?)
So I get a headache and put this sword away again, until I stumble upon this on the internet, Native American Weapons: “There are many references in literature – descriptions, drawings and pictographs of swords by North American Indians Many of them were probably English, Model l796, light cavalry swords which were surpluses after the Napoleonic Wars These were sold throughout the American West, and one outlet in the l840s was the Bordeaux Trading Post near present- day Chadron. They became a type of status symbol, particularly amongst some of the plains tribes”. It starts to appear to me that the story of this sword being picked-up on a Montana battlefield is not as funny as I had originally thought.
What I have is an English Model 1796 light cavalry sword made by Josh H.Reddel & Co. with an inscription. This sword “may” have possibly been picked off of a Montana battlefield. It “may” have been owned by the Sioux. It may have historical significance and I may awake from this and commit Hari-kari with this sword.
Sword:
This sword has been exposed to the elements on the right side know more than a few years. (I base that on my experience with swords, some 25 odd years, with the emphasize on odd)
1796 English light Calvary sword
Manufacturer: Josh H. Reddel & Co
Length blade 30.5” (shortened, spear point removed)
Sword hallmarks: Josh H. Reddel & Co (spine)
Small English crown (right side fuller hardly visible through rust, visible only with 25x magnification only)
Inscription in gold almost completely faded:
“Found at Gen Custers Slaughter By The Indians”
(Gold paint appears period to 1870-1910)
Now as your laughing, for I did... can you let me know your opinion please?
I purchased the sword myself in New Jersey. I will never get any more info from the seller. The gentleman who sold the sword had no knowledge of swords or that the inscription was on it. This was a doorstop to the seller!
I know through my research that “The 7th Calvary boxed up and sent back their swords to Fort Abraham Lincoln” on the way to the Little Big Horn.
Please send me your imput as I have reached the end of my path
Best regards
Bill Rhumm