|
|
Post by Dark Cloud on Jun 29, 2008 15:23:24 GMT -5
Wiggs/realbird/Pohanka lied? Shocking. And stupidly done? Who would have thou.......
Well, I did. As predicted. Fortunately nipped in the bud.
BS, so long as Merkel never notes that Hiswillingshill, the brilliant novice who recognized my genius right off, was also me, we're safe. Hiswillingshill's posts were only slightly more gaseous and fawning than others offered in seriousness to deceive by some here.
Although, really, my presentation before the Niwot Harold Society was breathtaking and you're all the poorer for missing it. The endnoted detail about Bishop Odo's mace (42 endnotes in Power Point colour graphics with quotes from books that mention a description of the mace by Ethelrue the Unsober, born two centuries later, confirms my thesis by weight of broadside. See: Donovan, James and Churchill, Ward for how to make this work for you. They all agree that the mace was greenish in colour.)
|
|
|
|
Post by pohanka on Jun 29, 2008 16:57:55 GMT -5
DC said OUTED, not ousted. ALTHOUGH anyone who writes althought doesn't have a lot of room to criticize. Spell Check is available at all times. Perhaps this would be a good time to tell everyone, especially "pohanka" who claims he never heard of Brian and thought the name sounded like a cool Indian name, that I can see your email addresses even when you put them as "hidden." People may jump to whatever conclusions they choose. Contrary to your epiphany, "I can see your e-mail address even when you put them as hidden," my husband was an administrator of his own Web-site for the last two years so I was perfectly aware of that fact. The difference between you and he is that he would never compromise his administrative duties by "hinting" at an impropriety concerning confidential information. Since you chose to do so let me assist you in your quest to enlighten the general public of the profile E-mail you superciliously referred to. "Joewiggs @att.net. I did not realize that permission was require to use his profile. I am not Wiggs, and will never be Wiggs as I have stated. However, I have followed his posts on the AAO and on this site as Realbird for the last few years and, wished to continue his line of thought. I will not discuss his refusal to post any further on this site. I would hope that each poster may be judged upon the content of his or her threads. With an infinitive multiplicity of persona's and personalties, who an individual may be is inconsequential when the ability to prove any identification is impossible. However, information that flows through the forum should be judged and scrutinized for content and value, not the sender. Your catty remarks regarding my accidental improper usage of a word and choice of a screed name was petty and dark. Besides spell check could not catch " thought" because it is a true word; I just used it incorrectly by inadvertently adding a "t".CaroleGeurin |
|
|
|
Post by markland on Jun 30, 2008 2:47:46 GMT -5
DC said OUTED, not ousted. ALTHOUGH anyone who writes althought doesn't have a lot of room to criticize. Spell Check is available at all times. Perhaps this would be a good time to tell everyone, especially "pohanka" who claims he never heard of Brian and thought the name sounded like a cool Indian name, that I can see your email addresses even when you put them as "hidden." People may jump to whatever conclusions they choose. Contrary to your epiphany, "I can see your e-mail address even when you put them as hidden," my husband was an administrator of his own Web-site for the last two years so I was perfectly aware of that fact. The difference between you and he is that he would never compromise his administrative duties by "hinting" at an impropriety concerning confidential information. Since you chose to do so let me assist you in your quest to enlighten the general public of the profile E-mail you superciliously referred to. "Joewiggs @att.net. I did not realize that permission was require to use his profile. I am not Wiggs, and will never be Wiggs as I have stated. However, I have followed his posts on the AAO and on this site as Realbird for the last few years and, wished to continue his line of thought. I will not discuss his refusal to post any further on this site. I would hope that each poster may be judged upon the content of his or her threads. With an infinitive multiplicity of persona's and personalties, who an individual may be is inconsequential when the ability to prove any identification is impossible. However, information that flows through the forum should be judged and scrutinized for content and value, not the sender. Your catty remarks regarding my accidental improper usage of a word and choice of a screed name was petty and dark. Besides spell check could not catch " thought" because it is a true word; I just used it incorrectly by inadvertently adding a "t".CaroleGeurin Carole, who is not Wiggs but whose posts are obviously proof-read by the same 7th graders as Wiggs, a couple things. I went over to dictionary.com and discovered that there is no such animal (or word even) as "althought" so spell-check would have found it (as it did on a check I just ran on this post) and secondly, while I admired Brian, I would not consider (and suspect he would have a good laugh at it) that his name is sacred. The problem with using the screen name you use is that many, including I, feel that it borders on (if not outright violates) bad taste. And I would suspect that most, if not all of the users of this forum, are cognizant of the dictatorial powers and access to information that a message board administrator has. Although your posting of Joe's email address leaves me a bit curious as Realbird's email address is hidden to other users and not mentioned in Diane's post. By the way, "outed" as used earlier by DC is slang meaning among other things: revealed or disclosed. Courtesy of dictonary.com Billy, who is still wondering what a "catalysis" is |
|
|
|
Post by biggordie on Jun 30, 2008 8:57:32 GMT -5
Analysis of a feline - and lotsa luck if you attempt same - courtesy of dictionary.nut.
Gordie
|
|
|
|
Post by BrokenSword on Jun 30, 2008 9:35:48 GMT -5
Billy-
Catalysis:
[From BrokenSword’s Great Book of BS: vol. 47, Chapter 19. P. 196]
Definition #1: The critique delivered by one woman to another woman regarding a third woman’s hair color, taste in fashion and true motive in choice of men.
Definition #2: The critique one man delivers to another man regarding a third man’s hair color, automobile, job performance and actual undesirability to women.
You're welcome,
BS
|
|
|
|
Post by Dark Cloud on Jun 30, 2008 10:35:10 GMT -5
He lies a lot, may use others' computers, may in the past years have had others re-write and post for him, is happy when attention to him is paid at any level whatsoever. As such, he's a tarbaby.
In the irrefutable past - it's still up - he tries to pass off others' work as his own, doesn't understand what others say, doesn't understand what he has sometimes posted. He's tried to pass himself off as a teacher, a cop, a soldier in the past without knowing very much about those jobs. His own writing style is pretty much a giveaway.
There is no plus side to this, and a real potential negative now that he's deliberately trying to elevate himself with the names of others. Merkel damned him, she made the connection, and that should settle it.
|
|
|
|
Post by crzhrs on Jun 30, 2008 12:13:44 GMT -5
Is this really necessary?
|
|
|
|
Post by Dark Cloud on Jun 30, 2008 15:19:18 GMT -5
Nothing here is necessary. But liars and frauds need be confronted, especially attaching the names of deceased individuals to their presentation for their elevation.
Well, recently deceased.
|
|
|
|
Post by Diane Merkel on Jul 1, 2008 2:14:51 GMT -5
I did not realize that permission was require to use his profile. I am not Wiggs, and will never be Wiggs as I have stated. However, I have followed his posts on the AAO and on this site as Realbird for the last few years and, wished to continue his line of thought. I will not discuss his refusal to post any further on this site. At the risk of being excessively catty, may I point out that you are not using the profile of "your husband." The Realbird identity has not posted since last September. You started "pohanka" on May 10. I'm sure that is a minor matter to some, but it certainly speaks to credibility, of which you currently have none with me. I don't usually care what people call themselves here but, when a person's identity is questioned by several long-term members, as yours is, I start paying attention. You, sir and/or madam, are no Pohanka. |
|
