Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 8, 2014 11:04:15 GMT -6
|
|
|
|
Post by quincannon on May 8, 2014 11:39:49 GMT -6
Chris: The way things are done is if your military wants something or wants to keep something, and the Commander and Chief wants it as well, in a time when budget funds are very tight, you first determine what support there is for that thing or those things in Congress. If the support is there beneath the surface, but the rhetoric is screaming cut, cut, cut, you, the Commander in Chief, propose that the item(s) be cut, then watch Congress scream to high heaven, and provide funds for the item(s). It is their way of proving they have a bigger male appendage than you do. You get what you wanted in the first place. Everyone is then happy.
If you recall I predicted that the A10's were not going anywhere to Tom some weeks ago.
|
|
|
|
Post by Yan Taylor on May 8, 2014 12:10:32 GMT -6
Break out the Winchesters girls (or should I say L85A2s), this is a fighting patrol; link |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 8, 2014 12:32:11 GMT -6
From Ian's link:
"We have to accept that we are different physiologically," she said.
Not sure if "raising awareness" will be of use to her. I think most understand it.
What's to accept?
|
|
|
|
Post by quincannon on May 8, 2014 12:52:54 GMT -6
Rest easy boys. No one's male appendage ever got smaller if a female cop arrested a bad guy, or a female firefighter put out the fire in your house as it was burning to the ground.
The key factor is that the very same standards need be applied. No fudging, No gun decking. Same means same but equality also means equal.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 8, 2014 13:03:29 GMT -6
Chuck,
Agree with the same standards being applied. Lest I was not clear about Major Judith Webb; my post was in support of her.
Best,
c.
|
|
