|
Post by "Hunk" Papa on Jun 14, 2012 9:25:07 GMT -6
I shall consider matters, as you feel strongly about Benteen's Bluffs, but Wallace misled at Chicago, about what happened at Little Big Horn - and the confusion continues. The experts were and are confused - not me. Are you suggesting that Benteen was in two places at once, that he went through Officer's call and did not comprehend that an attack was taking place, by his regiment, upon a village, in a valley. The same valley he was sent looking for. I believe there may be an ignore facility, use it. Thank you so very, much gentlemen. T'was a pleasure. Your fired ;D HR, now you are getting to the views of the testimony at the RCOI. That is a whole different subject and you should not try and build scenarios using that testimony intermingled with other evidence without very meticulous research. That seems to be something you are not inclined to do as you would rather try and spring 'revelations' on us to demonstrate your so-called ability to 'destroy theories.' I am relieved to be fired as the tasks you set are too simple to be a challenge. Regards. Hunk
|
|
|
Post by herosrest on Jun 15, 2012 10:20:24 GMT -6
A message was carried by Aricaree scout Stabbed to Custer's command at the end of the ridge. This was established in research by Orin G. Libby and Walter M. Camp. This is excluded from all serious study of the battle. It is accepted that Boston Custer rode to join Custer's command. It is not considered that Stabbed did also, and survived the battle. This is simple example of bias, a fact of life. Biases towards Benteen, Reno and Custer are considerable and historical fact.
The RCoI provided much information about the battle, but its purpose was to clear Reno & Benteen of Whittaker's accusations and that took place. All is fair in love and war. Neither officer was going to roll over and be ruined.
The Wallace times were based on Maguires report, which is interpretted to mean that Custer & Reno arrived near the village at 2pm. Wrong, and that is the cause of the time confusions that endure - not the time of the place and time zones.
|
|
|
Post by "Hunk" Papa on Jun 15, 2012 15:16:53 GMT -6
1) A message was carried by Aricaree scout Stabbed to Custer's command at the end of the ridge. This was established in research by Orin G. Libby and Walter M. Camp. This is excluded from all serious study of the battle. It is accepted that Boston Custer rode to join Custer's command. It is not considered that Stabbed did also, and survived the battle. This is simple example of bias, a fact of life. Biases towards Benteen, Reno and Custer are considerable and historical fact. 2) The RCoI provided much information about the battle, but its purpose was to clear Reno & Benteen of Whittaker's accusations and that took place. All is fair in love and war. Neither officer was going to roll over and be ruined. 3) The Wallace times were based on Maguires report, which is interpretted to mean that Custer & Reno arrived near the village at 2pm. Wrong, and that is the cause of the time confusions that endure - not the time of the place and time zones. HR, you are getting plain silly now, especially in the face of all the factual information aligned against you. 1) No, see your Double D thread and for goodness sake try and keep the same topic from appearing on two different threads. That is just perverse. There is no bias here. It is just irrelevant and a misunderstanding. 2) The RCOI was called for by Reno himself and had nothing to do with clearing Benteen. The Court decided that it could not find anything to blame Reno for concerning his behaviour at the LBH, but do not pursue the matter of the RCOI unless you are prepared to lay out a long and detailed explanation of your reasoning. Short, unsubstantiated, opinions will not suffice. 3) Once and for all. The Wallace times are what he was obliged to keep as the official itinerist. Anything that Maguire used would be taken from Wallace and not the other way around. Should you bring this non-starter up again, you're on your own, as all it is is plain stubborness based on your own muddled thinking. Regards. Hunk
|
|