|
|
Post by rosebud on Aug 26, 2011 23:06:48 GMT -6
So Rain In The Face can learn to write that nice in a short time.....BULL, someone is signing these and making a fast buck.
Who would be dumb enough to buy something like that?
Rosebud
|
|
|
|
Post by "Hunk" Papa on Aug 27, 2011 13:29:13 GMT -6
So Rain In The Face can learn to write that nice in a short time.....BULL, someone is signing these and making a fast buck. Who would be dumb enough to buy something like that? Rosebud Someone prepared to pay $15,000.00? |
|
|
|
Post by crzhrs on Sept 2, 2011 13:13:49 GMT -6
Let's not forget it was Rain-in-the-Face that may have given Tom Custer the "extra" special going-over that resulted in TC being recognized only by his tattoos. Remember TC was the one who snuck up behind RITF, gragged him then wrestled him to the ground, arrested him and threw him in jail. I would think RITF would not forget that and if he recognized TC at the LBH he would be very willing to show TC just exactly what he thought of someone who creeped up from behind rather than face him man-to-man.
|
|
|
|
Post by herosrest on Oct 21, 2011 13:55:38 GMT -6
It is interesting from RiF's own words, to discover how his kharma - 'bed me baby if I am brave' - led to Hunzinger's death and the rescue of a cut off, heavily outnumbered and out of ammo Custer , in Aug. 1873.
Rain in the Face's map, proves E.S. Curtis's research of the battle.
|
|
|
|
Post by "Hunk" Papa on Oct 31, 2011 17:08:52 GMT -6
It is interesting from RiF's own words, to discover how his kharma - 'bed me baby if I am brave' - led to Hunzinger's death and the rescue of a cut off, heavily outnumbered and out of ammo Custer , in Aug. 1873. Rain in the Face's map, proves E.S. Curtis's research of the battle. As Snagglepuss used to say, "Where'd'ye get this stuff?" Rain draw his map on the back of a buckskin coat for W. Kent Thomas on August 12 1894 in the presence of E.E. McFadden. Edward S. Curtis interviewed a number of Lakota warriors who had been at the LBH but Rain was not one of them, because it was not until 1905 that Curtis started looking into the battle and went to the site with one Lakota, Red Hawk. He conducted no further interviews with some other Lakota warriors but as Rain died in September 1905, he was not one of them. In August 1907, Curtis went the the LBH with the three Crows, White Man Runs him, Goes Ahead and Hairy Moccasin. It was from going over the ground with these scouts that he drew his own map which he published in 1908, using as a basis the 1891 Marshall map. So as the Rain map came first, presumably your bizarre logic will now tell us that the Curtis map proves Rain's research of the battle? Confused of Jersey (Old not New) |
|
Carl
Full Member
Posts: 125
|
Post by Carl on Oct 22, 2015 13:42:40 GMT -6
Last night on PBS, I saw feature on brain, and memory.
Pointed out that false memories are common.
In regard to the RCOI, there are those who
accuse various people of lying. But since
memory is not always trusted, could the
minor differences in testimony be due
to the normal memory variations?
George Costanza said it is not a lie
if you believe it. Did Thompson
believe all he stated?
r
|
|
|
|
Post by Beth on Oct 22, 2015 15:00:36 GMT -6
Minds are not like a video tape that records everything for playback later.
Imagine 100 people watching a game and suddenly someone rushes on the field and shoots a ref. You have 100 eye witness of a common event but you will also have 100 versions of that event. Not a single person lies as they tell what they see but each story is going to be different.
It's not just that false memories become common but the further away from the event, memories shared between individuals start becoming common memories so that years later you start to be unable to tell what you heard and what you actually experienced.
If those 100 people are allowed to discuss what happened at the game you would find that a sameness to their story will start to develope--people who were at the snack bar will be giving the same story as someone who was at the 50 yard line...
It seems impossible to believe that events you think you would never forget would get blurred but you have to remember when you are in a crisis situation your brain is picking and choosing what it will retain but it is mainly trying to chose the information that will get out out alive.
|
|
|
|
Post by herosrest on Nov 8, 2015 18:38:59 GMT -6
Last night on PBS, I saw feature on brain, and memory. Pointed out that false memories are common. In regard to the RCOI, there are those who accuse various people of lying. But since memory is not always trusted, could the minor differences in testimony be due to the normal memory variations? George Costanza said it is not a lie if you believe it. Did Thompson believe all he stated?
DucemusThis is a good one for AZRanger who has discussed this matter, specifically in relation to modern Court hearings. RCoI of course was a tribunal with only the authority to make recommendation. Whittaker had been pressing for a Sente investigation and the request for an Inquiry neatly side-stepped the Senate debate which would have been required. |
|
|
|
Post by tubman13 on Nov 9, 2015 7:28:21 GMT -6
HR,
Not so the House and Senate had already refused Whittaker, this was court of last resort, and Reno requested it.
|
|
|
|
Post by herosrest on Nov 10, 2015 17:46:38 GMT -6
HR, Not so the House and Senate had already refused Whittaker, this was court of last resort, and Reno requested it. Hi Tubman13 - Have you got a source on this data, please. Always willing to learn. |
|
|
|
Post by tubman13 on Nov 11, 2015 6:52:36 GMT -6
HR, The attached is not the whole read, but the congressman mentioned W.W. Corlett, was one Whittaker's attempts. I will attempt to find the original piece I found. I don't store what I read. Probably should. majorreno.com/whittaker.html |
|
|
|
Post by herosrest on Nov 11, 2015 20:02:50 GMT -6
|
|
