Post by twomoons on Apr 10, 2005 8:19:39 GMT -6
I am a Native American. I was born in America and whether or not I have indian blood is or should be of no consequence to this discussion. But apparently you wish to know. As a matter of fact I do have Indian blood that courses through my veins. A heritage that I am very proud of. And I don't need some foreign born nut case telling me that I or my forefathers are or were savages. Hell the point has already been made - all wars are savage, brutal and insane! And if you had ever been in one, you would have known that. Wars are about killing, and killing in ANY way, shape or form is "savage", NEVER forget that -NEVER! I could recount my experiences, but then that would serve no meaningful purpose here! But known your insane way of trying to impress others, and your penchant for criticism, I can expect less, right?
You are so caught up in the myths of something, that to believe them, you are willing to denude yourself of any fact that "you think" is wrong. That is not open-ness that is a calleous disregard for something that you may have "overlooked," and this serves not to solve anything, but does perpetuate any and all myths. And, as we have all too often witnessed in these discussions. You don't apply logic and knowledge behind your statements, and staunchly stand upon primal evidence that modern science has proven wrong. You continually believe in books that others have written so that they could line their pockets with gold. And in doing so , you disregard any truths that they may be trying to cover up. Michno is an example of this. Why didn't he include the Native American scouts in his book? He left out the one element that would either corroborate what he was saying. OR, it would prove that what he was saying was a myth based upon fiction of old. It did the latter. Read the accounts of all of the Native American scouts, every one of them in their entireity! Then read Michno again. You have to believe one or the other, not both! I prefer to believe the scouts, they were there. And I prefer to believe that archaeology as a science is better than some unfounded notions based upon the fictions of the past. In each and every instance you shelter yourself from the truths, overlook key evidences, and apply no logic or knowledge to any of your arguements.
I don't ask you to believe everything that I say. But I at least ask you not to spread the myths? Discuss this in a civil manner befitting those of your ancestry. And try to respect others whose ancestry, beliefs, customs and ethnic values, that differ from yours. To do that you must bring logic & knowledge to this discussion based upon fact. And not bring into these discussions, racial or ethnic comparisions for which you have little or any knowledge of.
You are so caught up in the myths of something, that to believe them, you are willing to denude yourself of any fact that "you think" is wrong. That is not open-ness that is a calleous disregard for something that you may have "overlooked," and this serves not to solve anything, but does perpetuate any and all myths. And, as we have all too often witnessed in these discussions. You don't apply logic and knowledge behind your statements, and staunchly stand upon primal evidence that modern science has proven wrong. You continually believe in books that others have written so that they could line their pockets with gold. And in doing so , you disregard any truths that they may be trying to cover up. Michno is an example of this. Why didn't he include the Native American scouts in his book? He left out the one element that would either corroborate what he was saying. OR, it would prove that what he was saying was a myth based upon fiction of old. It did the latter. Read the accounts of all of the Native American scouts, every one of them in their entireity! Then read Michno again. You have to believe one or the other, not both! I prefer to believe the scouts, they were there. And I prefer to believe that archaeology as a science is better than some unfounded notions based upon the fictions of the past. In each and every instance you shelter yourself from the truths, overlook key evidences, and apply no logic or knowledge to any of your arguements.
I don't ask you to believe everything that I say. But I at least ask you not to spread the myths? Discuss this in a civil manner befitting those of your ancestry. And try to respect others whose ancestry, beliefs, customs and ethnic values, that differ from yours. To do that you must bring logic & knowledge to this discussion based upon fact. And not bring into these discussions, racial or ethnic comparisions for which you have little or any knowledge of.